Less attitude; more bike paths, mountains and beer.
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Green Signature Drafts

Working for a sustainable design consultant, as I do, I am continually exposed to exciting and interesting individuals with progressive views and ideas. The climate change crisis is real, and I’m excited to be helping in some small way to affect architectural design in a positive and sustainable way. But the sustainable message is bubbling over into my colleagues’ email signatures, as evidenced by a recent email, which carried the following message after the author’s signoff:

“please consider the environment before printing this message.”

What a great idea, to follow every email message with a smug, self-satisfied, holier-than-thou little dig at your own client, I thought! That’s not condescending at all! So this evening I sat down to draft my very own “green email signature”. I’m very excited about my drafts so far:

  • Like, don’t print this, OK?

  • Printing this message kills trees. Print is murder!

  • Please consider filing this email in an email folder and refraining from printing it, since that would be redundant and a waste of space, time and paper. Just make sure you back up your hard drive, you idiot.

  • Please respond to this email as soon as possible, as I am soon unplugging all my electrical devices and moving to the woods. And this should go without saying, but you should NOT print this message, since the more you print, the less woods I will have left to live in. Again, please hurry.

  • You know pal, you really should think about what you’re doing there, with your mouse cursor on the “print” button; don’t you realize that trees are a precious and beautiful resource? You already have the material, right there in front of your oil-thirsty face, in digital format. You should read it on your monitor instead of wasting precious paper to print out what you already have, you heartless bastard! I can’t believe you could be so stupid, you PAPER WASTER! Of course, by reading it on your monitor you’re running your computer which consumes about 450 watts of power while it’s running whereas you could print this out on a few sheets of paper and power down. Hmmm. Let me think about this for a second. I’ve got it! I’ll just bet you don’t do two-sided printing, thereby wasting TWICE as much paper as I do when I print things duplex (even though I almost never, ever, print things, because I am pleased to consider the environment before doing so)! Oh you climate change accelerator, you! I hate you! Yes, far better that you read this on screen, especially since you don’t have a duplex printer. Come to think of it, you should really get a duplex printer; I can’t believe you don’t have one of those! Jesus, you are a resource hogging pig! Aren’t you glad you have me to help you think about these issues? By the way, how many miles per gallon do you get with you car? You DO drive a hybrid, don’t you? Put that hamburger DOWN, dammit! LISTEN TO ME!!

20 comments

1 Perry { 03.30.07 at 9:03 am }

Under normal circumstances, why would people want to print out e-mails?

2 rpg { 03.30.07 at 10:15 am }

You’re trying to apply logic here, Perry. It’s been my experience that many folks—particularly non-computer-savvy types—tend to print out emails and their attachments as a matter of course. I’ve seen this in the last three office environments I’ve worked in, including my current one, ironically enough. Still, I can’t bring myself to put an environmental message in my email signature regarding this stuff. Haven’t figured out how to do it without sounding like a putz.

3 Laurel Van Driest { 03.30.07 at 7:56 pm }

Okay, and you just gave me the laugh back. Thanks! May I humbly suggest as an e-mail signature the one that I have thought about but am not brave enough to do quite yet: “Spinning plates for (company) since 1989”? Plates (as long as they are not paper—oh, God; don’t make me do the energy calculations for running the dishwasher versus recycling) being so non-controversial.

4 Laurel Van Driest { 03.30.07 at 7:57 pm }

And by the way, I vote for e-signature #3. Because it uses the word idiot, which is so caring and Boulder-ish.

5 jimmy { 04.08.07 at 1:15 pm }

You know what the worst part of my signature is Rob? It’s in Outlook. BLAM - adding insult to injury.

The windig font doesn’t work unless you messages are in HTML reader, so if I am not paying attention, it reads “p before printing, please consider the environment” . . . Hold on a minute – that’s not what you have written in this blog. Is there someone ELSE out there who stolen my signature? Stay in Boulder a little longer and you’ll have the same one. You’re still not completely affected by that place yet if you’re still posting like this.

6 s n { 07.05.07 at 5:52 am }

This is silly – “Please consider the environement…” is a friendly reminder to think about whether you really need to print out the whole email or whether you might not…also – it makes you think to at least select only the important info to print rather than the whole chain…it is not treating clients like idiots, it is showing that as a company you support the green cause and hope that they do too.

7 rpg { 07.05.07 at 9:35 am }

Dear ’s n’,
I recommend you re-read the first statement in your comment. This whole post was half rant and half joke and it should be obvious to anyone with half a sense of humor.

8 ashley scott { 02.27.08 at 11:04 am }

When you consider that each ton of printer toner is made from 463 burned cow carcasses I think everone has missed the real issue here. Your “green email signature” really needs give the cows a voice too! (See Moovement for Bovine Rights official website)

9 Philip Robinson { 03.05.08 at 1:31 pm }

Reducing Carbon is a very seriopus and emotional area. Our experience is that you need to motivate people not tell them. “Turn the lights off ” doesn’t work. Be kind (to people and the environment)

We still find many sceptics (I don’t believe Climate Change is happening),
still more scinics ( I dont care about climate change)
Even more people who say “its happening but it wasn’t caused by humans”
BUT NO one who can argue that there is one simple answer REDUCING CARBON. Cos’ not only does it help the environmnet but it helps us to save money too.

In our office we insist any required printing for internal use is on the back of paper we receive in the mail. We use it again before recycling.

I’m an old croney myself and not therefore used to electronic media like the rest of you. Its the olddies that require printing.

My view and that of the thousands we have researched is this.

ASK NICELY, SUGGEST NICELY, GIVE A REASON THEY WILL AGREE WITH and then youll GET WHAT YOU WANT. so:

Please think carefully before you print off this e mail or any others. Some people find it more difficult not to have a printed version, so if that’s you fine but please think about the environment. AND SAVE YOURSELF SOME MONEY TOO. If you do print e mails then why not use the back of a letter or mail shot you are about to throw away so you reuse the paper and save money.

Oh please dont forget to recycle the paper when you eventually finish with it.

Thanks from, me the trees, your boss for saving money and everyone in the world for doing just a little to help in Reducing Carbon.

For more free ideas on Reducing Carbon call 0044 845 388 5019 UK office time please.

10 Ryan { 04.24.08 at 9:20 am }

I’m going to have to adopt “Printing this message kills trees. Print is murder!” as my tagline. thanks for the tip.

11 kate { 05.12.08 at 1:38 pm }

So, i printed this page 37 times to share it around the office. just kidding. I’m using the final sig, myself.

12 kate { 05.12.08 at 1:39 pm }

So, I printed this page 37 times to share it around the office. just kidding.

Me? I’m using the 4th sig.

13 kate { 05.12.08 at 1:40 pm }

wow, i waste pixels too. Sorry for the repeat, yet varied, post. i think my keyboard revolted.

14 Perry H { 05.16.08 at 6:30 am }

how about adding “Please lower the brightness on your monitor before reading this to save electricity” before the email!

15 Krista { 05.21.08 at 9:57 am }

I absolutely love all the ideas! Thanks. :)

16 Justin Dean { 05.30.08 at 11:47 am }

People are idiots. Paper comes from tree farms and thus don’t affect the larger ecosystem. Reading electronic mail (especially on my dual LCD monitors running from a Dell at work) wastes far more electricity than paper. My email signature reads “Please consider the environment and print this email,
instead of viewing it on your 450watt energy wasting computer.”

17 Please don’t print this e-mail unless you really need to! « Infomancy { 06.02.08 at 1:02 pm }

[...] why not use some the excellent alternatives from Green Signature Drafts, one has over 1,000 characters (which will mean something later). This article (2007-03-29) was [...]

18 Rachel { 06.11.08 at 7:03 am }

So when I first saw the ‘environmental signature’ tag, my first thought was that it was the most condescending thing I’d ever seen.

Who prints their emails anyway? Funny that, now my job is to help a company become more ‘green’ and one of our projects might be to require addition of something like this to everyone’s email signature… And because of a record retention policy, many people do print their emails because they don’t know how to save them on their computer… patronizing signature, here I come!

19 petemayo { 06.24.08 at 9:30 am }

haha, This is hillarious, I thought I was the only person in the world who thought this was snotty.
When I first saw that “please consider the environment…” signature I was like what asses, do you really think everyone out there is a child who needs parenting?
However, when I would share my grief with people I would get looks like I’m a crazy maniac, which on second thought is prolly deserved.

20 Matt { 07.23.08 at 8:03 am }

Oh man. The CEO of my company put that signature at the end of all of his emails about a year ago, and now it’s spreading around the office. I can’t be the only one in the office who finds this condescending, but no one has mentioned it so far.
But, I’m glad others are finding humor in it as well.

Leave a Comment