<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Signature Drafts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/</link>
	<description>Less attitude; more bike paths, mountains and beer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:27:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-31703</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-31703</guid>
		<description>Ed, 

Watch *for* the environment? Like is it sneaking up behind me? &quot;Hey Rob, check your six, it&#039;s the environment!&quot;

One thing you got right Ed is that it&#039;s a silly reaction. So sad that more people can&#039;t lighten up and see the joke behind it all. ANd for the record, I AM aware, and I AM conscious of what&#039;s happening, and I DO consider the environment, and I hardly print ANYTHING. 

How is &quot;this topic using a lot of trees&quot;? I&#039;d love to hear all about how my blog post -- created and distributed entirely w/o paper -- is wasting paper. Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, </p>

<p>Watch <strong>for</strong> the environment? Like is it sneaking up behind me? &#8220;Hey Rob, check your six, it&#8217;s the environment!&#8221;</p>

<p>One thing you got right Ed is that it&#8217;s a silly reaction. So sad that more people can&#8217;t lighten up and see the joke behind it all. ANd for the record, I AM aware, and I AM conscious of what&#8217;s happening, and I DO consider the environment, and I hardly print <span class="caps">ANYTHING. </span></p>

<p>How is &#8220;this topic using a lot of trees&#8221;? I&#8217;d love to hear all about how my blog post &#8212; created and distributed entirely w/o paper &#8212; is wasting paper. Sheesh.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-31702</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-31702</guid>
		<description>Silly reaction to a good initiative. be aware and watch for the environment. It&#039;s not only the message but the way you react to it.
Btw this topic is using a lot of trees according to google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly reaction to a good initiative. be aware and watch for the environment. It&#8217;s not only the message but the way you react to it.<br />
Btw this topic is using a lot of trees according to google.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-31671</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-31671</guid>
		<description>Hi Liz,

Well, we&#039;ll have to disagree then. I am a bike riding carbon-fearing greenie such as yourself, and I DO FIND THE GREEN SIGS ANNOYING AND SANCTIMONIOUS. I do energy efficiency research for a National Laboratory. I get it. I identify with the message. And I find it extremely snotty to place that message in business communications. I too go nuts when people automatically print out email and pdf files (especially when they sit there and read them next to their computer!), but that&#039;s not the point. Try and see it from their point of view. Apparently it&#039;s hard for greenies like us to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Liz,</p>

<p>Well, we&#8217;ll have to disagree then. I am a bike riding carbon-fearing greenie such as yourself, and I DO <span class="caps">FIND THE GREEN SIGS ANNOYING AND SANCTIMONIOUS.</span> I do energy efficiency research for a National Laboratory. I get it. I identify with the message. And I find it extremely snotty to place that message in business communications. I too go nuts when people automatically print out email and pdf files (especially when they sit there and read them next to their computer!), but that&#8217;s not the point. Try and see it from their point of view. Apparently it&#8217;s hard for greenies like us to do so.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-31670</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-31670</guid>
		<description>This is great.  I work in the suburbs and live in the city.  In a 250 person office, I am the only person that regularly rides my bike to work, rides the metro &amp; bus on the other days.  Everyone else drives, even though they live a lot closer than I do.  And the woman who sits behind me prints out every email she gets and sticks it in a manila folder and it drives me nuts.  My thought is that the people who have thought about it will *like* the signature - because they identify with it (like I do).  The people who haven&#039;t thought about it will find it sanctimonious, because they love to hate us bike riding, carbon-fearing, digital-era greenies.  (and yes, I&#039;m outraged, look at what&#039;s happening to our world).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great.  I work in the suburbs and live in the city.  In a 250 person office, I am the only person that regularly rides my bike to work, rides the metro &amp; bus on the other days.  Everyone else drives, even though they live a lot closer than I do.  And the woman who sits behind me prints out every email she gets and sticks it in a manila folder and it drives me nuts.  My thought is that the people who have thought about it will <strong>like</strong> the signature - because they identify with it (like I do).  The people who haven&#8217;t thought about it will find it sanctimonious, because they love to hate us bike riding, carbon-fearing, digital-era greenies.  (and yes, I&#8217;m outraged, look at what&#8217;s happening to our world).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-31383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-31383</guid>
		<description>If you really love the environment, then don&#039;t add a green message. Keep your signature short too. Because more than often the &quot;green reminder&quot; becomes the only reason why a one page email becomes two.  You need to trust others that they will make a good judgement. Don&#039;t presume that people don&#039;t &quot;think before printing&quot; the email. Give people the benefit of the doubt, please~!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you really love the environment, then don&#8217;t add a green message. Keep your signature short too. Because more than often the &#8220;green reminder&#8221; becomes the only reason why a one page email becomes two.  You need to trust others that they will make a good judgement. Don&#8217;t presume that people don&#8217;t &#8220;think before printing&#8221; the email. Give people the benefit of the doubt, please~!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About printing and being pathetic &#171; The no-logic blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-31309</link>
		<dc:creator>About printing and being pathetic &#171; The no-logic blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-31309</guid>
		<description>[...] why not use some the excellent alternatives fromÂ Green Signature Drafts, one has over 1,000 characters (which will mean something later). This article (2007-03-29) was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] why not use some the excellent alternatives from&Acirc;&nbsp;Green Signature Drafts, one has over 1,000 characters (which will mean something later). This article (2007-03-29) was [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psykhe</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-30961</link>
		<dc:creator>psykhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-30961</guid>
		<description>I have a colleague in an office that is priting anything, any mail. Sometimes she just needs to give a price to a costumer and she prints all the conversation, sometimes like 4-5 pages or even more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a colleague in an office that is priting anything, any mail. Sometimes she just needs to give a price to a costumer and she prints all the conversation, sometimes like 4-5 pages or even more.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-30928</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-30928</guid>
		<description>Ashley: it&#039;s sanctimonious because it presumes the reader HASN&#039;T thought about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashley: it&#8217;s sanctimonious because it presumes the reader <span class="caps">HASN&#8217;T </span>thought about it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AshleyV</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-30924</link>
		<dc:creator>AshleyV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-30924</guid>
		<description>Matt- unfortunately, though it would be nice, the paper industry doesn&#039;t actually plant trees- they plant seeds. 

Also, Rob, why is it so sanctimonious to ask someone to please think about anything? Seems pretty harmless. Maybe the problem is that everyone is constantly trying to find a reason to be insulted. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt- unfortunately, though it would be nice, the paper industry doesn&#8217;t actually plant trees- they plant seeds. </p>

<p>Also, Rob, why is it so sanctimonious to ask someone to please think about anything? Seems pretty harmless. Maybe the problem is that everyone is constantly trying to find a reason to be insulted. Just a thought.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/comment-page-1/#comment-30868</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts#comment-30868</guid>
		<description>How about:  

Go ahead and print this out. Itâ€™s okay! The wood and paper industry plants 1.7 million new trees EVERY DAY. Since 1987 U.S. forests have increased by 12 million acres to 755 million nationwide â€“ about the same as 100 years ago (www.abundantforests.org).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about:  </p>

<p>Go ahead and print this out. It&acirc;€™s okay! The wood and paper industry plants 1.7 million new trees <span class="caps">EVERY DAY.</span> Since 1987 <span class="caps">U.S. </span>forests have increased by 12 million acres to 755 million nationwide &acirc;€“ about the same as 100 years ago (www.abundantforests.org).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
