<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rumblestrip &#187; email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rumblestrip.org/tag/email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org</link>
	<description>Less attitude; more bike paths, mountains and beer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Green Signatures in the News (Again)</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/11/21/green-signatures-in-the-news-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/11/21/green-signatures-in-the-news-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green email signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/11/21/green-signatures-in-the-news-again</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, my silly little piece on &#8220;green&#8221; email signatures is in the news again, this time in the L.A. Times.  When I wrote that, it was cathartic because I was so frustrated by a particular co-worker and his sanctimonious ways, and his mindless insistence that we all preach to our clients this message that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my <a href="http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts">silly little piece</a> on &#8220;green&#8221; email signatures is in the news again, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-email20nov20,0,7259489.story?coll=la-home-center">this time in the <span class="caps">L.A.</span> Times</a>.  When I wrote that, it was cathartic because I was so frustrated by a particular co-worker and his sanctimonious ways, and his mindless insistence that we all preach to our clients this message that I felt went without saying.  Who knew it would become the single most popular post on my website and the source for two newspaper articles on green email signatures (and a television interview that as far as I know landed on the cutting room floor)?  </p>

<p>Of course the fact that I work in sustainable design and live in left-leaning Boulder Colorado made my frowny post on green email signatures the perfect ammo for conservative papers like the <a href="http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/05/18/quoted">Wall Street Journal</a> and the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-email20nov20,0,7259489.story?coll=la-home-center"><span class="caps">L.A.</span> Times</a>&#8212;here was a guy who supposedly cared about the environment and even he is saying these signatures are stupid!  Co-workers (and strangers reaching me through my website) have accused me of being a hipocrit (sic), but I think they miss the point.  These whiny, sniveling exhortations to &#8220;please consider the environment&#8221; make you look exactly like the stereotype the Fox News windbags are trying to perpetuate.  I&#8217;m not playing along, and you shouldn&#8217;t either.  Save that unbridled environmental enthusiasm for <a href="http://www.fuh2.com/index.php">flipping the bird at the next Hummer</a> you see.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/11/21/green-signatures-in-the-news-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quoted</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/05/18/quoted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/05/18/quoted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/05/18/quoted</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, what the hell do you know.  One of my little old blog posts has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal!

Something tells me that a lot of WSJ readers who may ultimately ferret out my website will not be entertained by the majority of my content, however&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what the hell do you know.  One of my little old <a href="http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts">blog posts</a> has been <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117944974689307051.html">quoted</a> in the Wall Street Journal!</p>

<p>Something tells me that a lot of <span class="caps">WSJ </span>readers who may ultimately ferret out my website will not be entertained by the majority of my content, however&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/05/18/quoted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Signature Drafts</title>
		<link>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[laffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Working for a sustainable design consultant, as I do, I am continually exposed to exciting and interesting individuals with progressive views and ideas.  The climate change crisis is real, and I&#8217;m excited to be helping in some small way to affect architectural design in a positive and sustainable way.  But the sustainable message [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working for a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_design">sustainable design</a> consultant, as I do, I am continually exposed to exciting and interesting individuals with progressive views and ideas.  The climate change crisis is real, and I&#8217;m excited to be helping in some small way to affect architectural design in a positive and sustainable way.  But the sustainable message is bubbling over into my colleagues&#8217; email signatures, as evidenced by a recent email, which carried the following message after the author&#8217;s signoff:</p>

<p>&#8220;please consider the environment before printing this message.&#8221;</p>

What a great idea, to follow every email message with a smug, self-satisfied, holier-than-thou little dig at your own client, I thought!  That&#8217;s not condescending at all!  So this evening I sat down to draft my very own &#8220;green email signature&#8221;.  I&#8217;m very excited about my drafts so far:<br />
<ul>
	<li>Like, don&#8217;t print this, OK?</li>
	<li>Printing this message kills trees.  Print is murder!</li>
	<li>Please consider filing this email in an email folder and refraining from printing it, since that would be redundant and a waste of space, time and paper.  Just make sure you back up your hard drive, you idiot.</li>
	<li>Please respond to this email as soon as possible, as I am soon unplugging all my electrical devices and moving to the woods.  And this should go without saying, but you should <span class="caps">NOT </span>print this message, since the more you print, the less woods I will have left to live in.  Again, please hurry.</li>
	<li>You know pal, you really should think about what you&#8217;re doing there, with your mouse cursor on the &#8220;print&#8221; button; don&#8217;t you realize that trees are a precious and beautiful resource? You already have the material, right there in front of your oil-thirsty face, in digital format. You should read it on your monitor instead of wasting precious paper to print out what you already have, you heartless bastard! I can&#8217;t believe you could be so stupid, you <span class="caps">PAPER WASTER</span>! <em>Of course, by reading it on your monitor you&#8217;re running your computer which consumes about 450 watts of power while it&#8217;s running whereas you could print this out on a few sheets of paper and power down. Hmmm. Let me think about this for a second.</em> I&#8217;ve got it! I&#8217;ll just bet you don&#8217;t do two-sided printing, thereby wasting <span class="caps">TWICE </span>as much paper as I do when I print things duplex (even though I almost never, ever, print things, because I am pleased to consider the environment before doing so)! Oh you climate change accelerator, you! I <em>hate</em> you! Yes, far better that you read this on screen, especially since you don&#8217;t have a duplex printer. Come to think of it, you should really get a duplex printer; I can&#8217;t believe you don&#8217;t have one of those!  Jesus, you are a resource hogging pig!  Aren&#8217;t you glad you have me to help you think about these issues? By the way, how many miles per gallon do you get with you car? You DO drive a hybrid, don&#8217;t you? Put that hamburger <span class="caps">DOWN, </span>dammit! <span class="caps">LISTEN</span> TO ME!!</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rumblestrip.org/2007/03/29/green-signature-drafts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
