Ever since Brenda & I moved to Boulder there has been one glaring omission from our daily lives, and that is settling down to read a good local newspaper. Back in Jersey, the Star Ledger was an excellent paper that originated from the local county where we last lived in that state. We got great reporting and writing, on everything from the international to the very local. The sports page was phenomenal. Molly Ivins' column was printed regularly, and we had almost no use for the New York Times and its holier-than-thou masthead font (and pricing).
Here in Boulder, we have the Daily Camera.
Now, being a Boulder newspaper, the Camera boasts some interesting and fun features that definitely pander to the local culture. There is a "trail dogs of the week" section, where reader-submitted photos of their dogs out on the many local trails are featured; there is a rock climbing column, as well as what has to be the highest percentage of sports section coverage devoted to cycling and running in all their forms. And of course the letters to the editor section--replete with outlandish requests and complaints from both ends of the liberal-conservative continuum--never fails to entertain. But the editing of this newspaper has been sub-par from day one, and pretty much every single day I can spot at least a couple of grammatical and spelling errors in what is supposed to be a professional newspaper, and one of the articles in today's business section encapsulates this dilemma so well I just had to share the first paragraph:
Camera's Circulation Falls By Alicia Wallace, Camera Business Writer New statistics show circulation at major US newspapers continued to tumble, and the Camera does not appears to be immune to the trend.
'nuff said? Thought so.